Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (3609)	9/16/2003 1:37:59 PM
From: tsigprofit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

We largely agree, this is scary ;--) No, but seriously - I do not believe Israel had anything to do with it. If such a thing happened, they would risk their entire future, which is very dependent on our supplying them with military equipment, and being the backer of last resort there. I also despise Bush, but do not believe he had anything to do with 9-11 either, as many posters have pondered. JMHO on all. I would have rather seen Bush pursue Al Qaeda into both Pakistan, even if it provoked a war with them, and rooted them out of Saudi Arabia, regardless of the consequences. I would have supported that. IMO - turning to Iraq was the easy way out. It does nothing to solve the problem, but it looks like we are doing something.. I believe in cooperating internationally, but dealing with attackers in a very aggressive way. IMO, we did not deal aggressively enough with the people who did 9-11, and dealt harshly with a country that was not involved at all.