Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (460030)	9/16/2003 7:28:42 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

That had the effect of ending the matter. Not really. The controversy over the logic and precedent of the decision rages on, as we see in the media daily. SCOTUS essential returned integrity to the statutes in place on the day the election was conducted. I.e. the Rule of Law. Incorrect, by definition. Everyone on all sides of the question stipulates that the rule of law was followed by the Florida court. Therefore the only thing that could change that rule of law was the USSC. This is the reason the USSC was brought into the picture.