SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (74928)9/16/2003 8:00:19 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I will wait. I thought I heard him state the principle (he must have stated it by now, one would think?)--or was I confusing you with him?

Oh well...I don't like prejudice and capricious treatment from so-called professionals. Fortunately, I have only encountered it on the internet--through Jewels. I don't have any idea how sexual orientation should cause a skilled person to discriminate. I'm a heterosexual. I take it at face value that qualified persons are equipped to treat me without exploitation. The idea that a therapist would refuse to see me because he or she had some sexual hang-up is really outside of any normal purview. It is too bizarre for me to even consider at this moment. Perhaps tomorrow...



To: Lane3 who wrote (74928)9/16/2003 8:07:31 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 82486
 
Fine..what is the "principle" that supports the capricious treatment of people by professionals, and which supports the discrimination of the therapist in refusing treatment on the basis of his own sexual hang-up?

Why was he not trained? By what cunning and secrecy was he graduated??



To: Lane3 who wrote (74928)9/16/2003 11:07:48 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
LOL!!!!