SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (27861)9/16/2003 11:09:44 PM
From: Rick Faurot  Respond to of 89467
 
Cheney Wants Supreme Court Review on Energy Case
Tue September 16, 2003 07:12 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration signaled its intent on Tuesday to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court a ruling requiring Vice President Dick Cheney to divulge information about his energy task force.

In papers filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia, Cheney's Justice Department lawyers said they intend to file a petition with the Supreme Court no later than Sept. 30.

Last week, the appeals court refused to reconsider its previous ruling against Cheney, leaving him with the option of appealing to the Supreme Court or complying with a lower court order to release information about his task force's contacts with the energy industry while drafting policy in 2001.

Arguing that the case raised important constitutional questions, Cheney's lawyers asked the appeals court to "stay" its mandate so that Cheney would have the opportunity to present his case to the Supreme Court.

"Judicial power cannot extend to compelling a vice president to disclose to private persons the details of the process by which a president obtains information and advice from the vice president ..." the lawyers said.

One of the groups suing for the information accused the administration of delaying tactics.
"At some point, the Bush administration is going to have to realize that the American people want to know what kind of influence energy corporations had over America's energy policies," said David Bookbinder, senior attorney for the Sierra Club, an environmental group.

Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club contend that Cheney consulted with industry executives like disgraced former Enron Corp. chief Kenneth Lay, while ignoring environmentalists as he drafted energy policy.

Cheney has acknowledged meeting Lay, but his lawyers say the task force was comprised of government officials, not corporate chieftains. The Bush administration has released thousands of pages of information from agencies involved in drafting the energy policy, but none from the White House.

Cheney was chief executive of energy and construction company Halliburton Co. from 1995 to 2000. His task force called for more oil and gas drilling and a revived nuclear power program.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (27861)9/17/2003 10:58:23 AM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Democrats ready to welcome Clark into race
Retired general to announce today that he'll seek presidency
sfgate.com
Marc Sandalow, Washington Bureau Chief Wednesday, September 17, 2003
Washington -- A southern investment banker with a lengthy military career who did not announce his Democratic Party affiliation until age 58 is hardly a profile of a liberal's dream candidate.

But as Wesley Clark announces his candidacy for president this morning in Little Rock, Ark., Democrats from all parts of the political spectrum -- and even Republicans -- believe they've found the man to challenge the incumbent.

It helps that Clark has an impeccable resume: first in his class at West Point, a Rhodes scholar, a four-star general, recipient of a Silver Star, Bronze Star and Purple Heart, NATO supreme allied commander, and commander in chief of the United States Southern Command.

It also helps that he has nabbed lots of face time on cable television denouncing the administration's failure to build an international coalition in Iraq.

But by far his most important quality in the eyes of many Democrats is his perceived ability to defeat President Bush.

"For all the rabid Democrats who really dislike George Bush with a passion, for them the No. 1 thing is how they can beat him," said San Francisco pollster David Binder when asked whether liberals might find Clark attractive.

"If he can beat Bush, he's going to be very popular," Binder said.

Angered by Bush's conservative agenda and humbled by their inability to win majorities in Congress, state houses or among the nation's governors, Democrats are growing increasingly pragmatic when looking at the 2004 presidential race.

Many Democrats are abuzz, even before they examine Clark's positions on cutting taxes, abortion rights or gun control, at the prospect of someone who can take it to Bush and reclaim the White House for their party.

"He'll be seen by (liberals) as Bill Clinton II," said Bob Mulholland, a spokesman for the California Democratic Party. "They'll read that he's from Arkansas, a Rhodes scholar, top of his class, and socially liberal.

"Democrats smell Bush is a one-term president. Clark has been on those cable shows for months and months bashing Bush, so liberals will love him."

The buzz over Clark is in part a reflection of the unsettled nature of the current Democratic field.

Vermont Gov. Howard Dean appears to be the front-runner, though most Americans -- according to recent polls -- cannot name a single Democratic candidate. Word that Clark is expected to join the race attracted far more media coverage Tuesday than news that Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina formally announced his candidacy.

A Field Poll of California Democratic voters released today finds Dean comfortably ahead in the state, followed by Sens. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut,

John Kerry of Massachusetts, Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri and Clark.

"I think he'd do extremely well in California," said Rep. Mike Thompson, D- St. Helena, who has not yet endorsed Clark but said he is "really leaning in that direction."

"We need some passion right now, some intellectual passion to put us on the right track," Thompson said. "He may be the person we need in this country to bring us together."

Clark has never run for public office, and his positions on many issues must be pieced together through speeches and interviews.

He has been critical of Bush's Iraq policy, insisting that the administration overstated the imminence of the threat and that the United States should have more narrowly focused its attention on the al Qaeda terrorist network.

An examination of Clark's statements suggests he is a moderate on social issues, placing him in the middle of the Democratic ideological spectrum. Only two weeks ago, during a CNN interview, did he publicly state he was a Democrat.

"It's a party that stands for internationalism, it's a party that stands for ordinary men and women, it's a party that stands for fair play and equity and justice and common sense and reasonable dialogue," Clark said.

He opposes Bush's tax cuts, is pro-choice, pro-affirmative action, supports an assault weapons ban but opposes most federal gun control and opposes drilling for oil in the Alaska wilderness.

Whether Clark will be able to satisfy liberal Democrats who form the nucleus of the party's primary voters remains to be seen. Unlike Dean's fiery criticism of Bush on domestic and international matters, Clark is far more soft spoken.

Clark's views on gays in the military may provide a test case for the party's liberal voters. While Clark says he favors gays serving openly, he might not push it as aggressively as some liberals would like.

"We've got a lot of gay people in the armed forces, always have had, always will have. And I think that . . . we should welcome people that want to serve, " Clark said in June on NBC's "Meet the Press."

But asked by host Tim Russert if that meant he would open the military to gays, he said "we need to charge the men and women responsible for the armed forces to come forward with that answer."

If Clark can persuade the Democratic base that he is one of them, some believe his four-star credentials could have a magnetizing effect.

"A liberal's stereotype might be to distrust military people, that he must be opposed to us on the issues," Binder said. "But if it turns out he's with them, and people think 'he's one of us,' that might create a lot of interest."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WESLEY KANNE CLARK
Age-birth information: 58, Dec. 23, 1944, Chicago.

Education: West Point, bachelor's degree, 1966; Oxford, masters in philosophy, politics and economics, 1968; U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, masters in military science, 1975.

Experience: Infantry officer and company commander, Vietnam, 1969-70; social science instructor and assistant professor, West Point, 1971-74; White House fellow, Office of Management and Budget, 1975-76; Army operations officer in Europe, 1976-78; assistant executive officer to the supreme allied commander, Brussels, 1978-79; battalion commander, Fort Carson, Colo., 1980-82;

chief of Army studies group, office of the chief of staff, 1983-84; commander at the National Training Center and 4th Infantry Division, 1984-88; director, battle command training program, 1988-89; commanding general, National Training Center, 1989-91; deputy chief of staff at U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, 1991-92; commanding general, 1st Cavalry Division, Ford Hood,

Texas, 1992-94; director for strategic plans and policy, Joint Staff, 1994-96;

commander, Southern Command, 1996-97; supreme allied commander, Europe, 1997- 2000; managing director of the brokerage firm Stephens Group Inc. in Little Rock, Ark., 2000-2002; military analyst, CNN, 2002; chairman and CEO, Wesley K.

Clark & Associates, 2002-present.

Family: Wife, Gertrude; son, Wesley.

Quote: "I'm concerned about the direction of the country. The policies need serious work. I just don't see the strategy. I just don't see the vision."



To: stockman_scott who wrote (27861)9/17/2003 11:03:37 AM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Wesley Clark adds grunt to fight against Bush
By Marian Wilkinson, Herald Correspondent in Washington
September 18, 2003
smh.com.au
Ready to be the next Dwight Eisenhower ... retired general Wesley Clark. Photo: AFP

A retired four-star general, a CNN personality, a Southerner and a Bob Dylan fan, Wesley Clark is being dubbed the Democrats' "dream candidate" by his party supporters and their best hope to lead the battle for the White House against George Bush next year.

After months of coat-trailing, General Clark announces his bid this morning (Sydney time) in Little Rock, Arkansas, to become the next president, hoping to follow another Arkansas native, his friend and adviser Bill Clinton.

"I believe I'm the most qualified man to stand for election, represent this party in this election of 2004," he told CNN.

"And I believe I'm the most qualified man to become the next president of the United States - man or woman."

The 58-year-old joins a crowded race, becoming the 10th Democratic candidate seeking nomination. He is seen as a long shot who has never run for elected office and who is entering the race far too late.

But he brings one great plus: a military resume that supporters say will overturn three decades of defensiveness by the Democrats on national security issues.

advertisement

advertisement

"I think you are going to see a new direction in the presidential campaign," said the telegenic Mr Clark, who led the war against Slobodan Milosovic in Kosovo as supreme allied commander of NATO.

He is fearless in criticising President Bush over his handling of the war on terrorism and Iraq. "People understand that when you're talking about national security you are also talking about personal security", said Mr Clark, who believes the US was wrong to begin the war on Iraq while the war on al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden continued.

Yesterday, reporters surrounded Mr Clark outside his Little Rock headquarters, while inside scores of party figures who once worked for Mr Clinton and his vice-president, Al Gore, began constructing a campaign to install the first general in the White House since Dwight Eisenhower.

But Wesley Clark is in danger of looking like a Clinton-Gore surrogate for a rematch with the Republicans and Mr Bush that will open old wounds.

Mr Clark praises Mr Clinton as a leader with "tremendous charisma, authority and conviction". His new spokesman, Mark Fabiani, was media manager for Bill and Hillary's war with the Republicans over Whitewater before working for Mr Gore in his 2000 campaign against Mr Bush.

Mr Clark's bid will also pit media rivals against each other. As CNN's chief military analyst during the Iraq war, he antagonised his competitors at Fox News with his sharp criticism of Mr Bush and the Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld.

Fox News immediately claimed that Senator Clinton would be co-chairwoman of the Clark campaign. "Not true, not true," her office told the Herald.

But Mr Clark is very much his own man. His role as NATO commander was cut short after a power struggle and Mr Clinton's defence secretary, William Cohen, backed the general's rivals in the Pentagon to force him into early retirement.

"I loved the army too much," Mr Clark told Esquire magazine recently.

"I loved it except for two days - the day I got shot and the day I was told I had to retire."

His long military career is both his greatest asset and liability. He was shot four times, learnt to walk again, graduated first at West Point, and went on to become a Rhodes scholar and a decorated general.

But he also earned a reputation in the military as someone who did not suffer fools gladly. His critics say he will find the transition to politics very difficult.

But for now, Mr Clark is putting his Democratic rivals on edge. As one party insider put it, he is like a Swiss army knife: however it unfolds, somebody gets cut.

His war hero status and national security credentials will undermine support for Senator John Kerry, the other Vietnam veteran in the race, and the conservative Joe Lieberman.

But Mr Clark will find the battle against the frontrunner, former Vermont governor Howard Dean, more difficult.

While Dr Dean has stumbled on national security issues, he can talk about health care, drug prices and the economy like - a Democratic candidate



To: stockman_scott who wrote (27861)9/17/2003 3:44:12 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Unlike slowminded Bush, Clark is sharp and quick-witted: Someone shouted to Clark, "Give 'em hell, General," as Clark was shaking hands with the crowd. He pumped his fist, smiled and replied, "We're going to give them the truth, and they'll think it's hell."