Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (75025)	9/18/2003 3:59:43 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Didn't you just say that the harm was emotional betrayal?" No I didn't. Reread that post please. Slowly. The three sentences following the comment on emotional betrayal are particularly significant. "...is harmful because_____________. What? Because of what?" Leave it blank. It is strongly stated as a no no in the ethics statement you posted. I can think of dozens of reasons to label it harmful. Maybe you know some I haven't thought of. Maybe you just think it is always fun. It doesn't matter. The fact that the masseus believes it is wrong as all masseus's are supposed to, is significant. The point is, it is unethical and inapropriate by everyone's definition.