Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (75069)	9/18/2003 7:11:08 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

then the rhetoric about needing to pay the price when one can demonstrate an issue of conscience should go away. Not at all. For example, Joe should never be forced to give a massage to someone he considered inappropriate. So if he is sued and loses, the remedy can't be that he gives this gay guy free massages for the rest of their lives. The remedy would have to be something else--like losing his license or paying compensation or something. saying that he should not be forced to act against his conscience is not giving him license to act consistent with his conscience but against the law or against the interests of others. It's only freeing him from being forced to do certain acts, not entitling him to engage in whatever other acts he chooses.