Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (2744)	9/19/2003 6:30:55 AM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

well, I usually construct my models from the observed data and you seemed to constructed the model in your mind 1st which is not bad per say. You're assuming I have given you all the data I have in one link? I bet you didn't even read it. Did you? I have years of reading and "observing" what I read becoming reality in the world. Step by step their plans are implemented. You're making a fast judgement before knowing any facts. Did you read the link I posted? Because that's just the first primer. Subject 54189 What is bad is that you assume that your model is correct based on the fact that there was a shadow on the wing of the plane that hit WTC. It is completely irrelevant to you that that shadow is normal and lack of it would violate basic physics. Not at all. I've never said anything about a shadow on the wing. But I've said a lot. Mostly that the very fact that the WTC attacks made it possible to lay the foundation of the New World Order police state in the form of the Patriot Act (and they are pushing Patriot Act II very hard now) and the creation of the Dept of Homeland Security (the new American style Gestapo). Observing how well the WTC attacks worked in the favor of advancing the New World Order makes the event suspicious. And add to that the hundreds of unanswered questions surrounding the 9-11 attacks. free.freespeech.org

To: AK2004 who wrote (2744)	9/19/2003 6:41:33 AM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Capitalism can be bad. Is it a good thing when millions around the world have their countries/democracis taken over by military dictatorships so capitalists in countries like the U.S. can exploit their resources? Many countries went from budding democracies with some political and personal freedom that were trying to get their economies going and make use of their own resources, to U.S. installed brutal military dictatorships that allowed U.S. multinationals to raped their resources. Iran, 1953, Gutemala, 1954, Brazil, 1960s, Chile, 1973, etc. I've benefitted greatly from capitalism, but I realize it does have a dark, largely ignored, underside that has brought misery to millions in the name of corporate profits. Perhaps that's just man's lot in life. But, I really don't think it has to be that way. People are too damn greedy and it leads to these gross imbalances in power and living standards. Human nature perhaps. After all, despite all their talk of egalitarianism, Communist Countries like the U.S.S.R. and China were/are also very socially stratisfied societies. The communist elite lived much better lives than the commoner under communism. There really is no such thing as a worker's paradise. Neither capitalism or communism has been particularly good if you're in the working class. I guess capitalism is better though, as long as it's not done under military dictatorship, since you have more freedom and more opportunity to better your lot in life than under a dictitorial communist system. Mankind still has a long way to go.