Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (75275)	9/22/2003 2:10:32 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The nuances are different, but are they any less important to the indivual? The theory proposed is that Mojo has a belief that touching a naked woman is wrong. Can't he equally have belief that touching a naked black person is wrong? His prejudice against women as clients isn't purely sexual, since he is also opposed to touching a naked female infant. It's gender related, which may arise from the potential of sexual arousal (though why can't he be expected to control his sexual impulses an keep the situation nonsexual as most other therapists are able to do?) but isn't solely sexual. Can't a member of Richard Butler's church be just as hostile to the idea of touching a naked black person as Mojo is to the idea of touching a naked woman?