Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (75301)	9/22/2003 3:13:23 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Once again solon... you have defined my side of an argument as something that I object to. You have asked a stupid question and argued with yourself to prove you have a smart answer to the stupid question you asked. You declare my position (which you have failed to define correctly) in agreement with you, based on your ability to mystically know my thinking. And declare a victory of the most ridiculous proportions....Interesting how some people find solace in life.

To: Solon who wrote (75301)	9/22/2003 3:18:35 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"If you have not identified people as high risk, then on what basis do you discriminate against homosexuals and women? That is the best question that has been asked since this discussion began. If you would take the time to re-read the post you are responding to, you may find that you and yours have yet to consider accurately the mojo perspective which isn't a "these people are bad" perspective at all. It is not a perspective of why this kind of person or that kind of person is "the problem." Want to think about that or; go off for the next five hundred posts declaring my position (not) for me and winning arguments with stuff no body disagrees with in the first place?