Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (75318)	9/22/2003 5:01:31 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

You are on record as hating discrimination more than anything you can imagine or something like that. No, actually that's sanctimony. So you get a twofer. <g> You have seen the venum laden posts ch has been responsible for and have been bolstering him on the side. I asked him to chill. I also asked Solon to chill. You don't remember that, do you? As for bolstering Chris, he's made some good points. Just because his tone has sometimes been a little rough on you, that means I'm supposed to discredit the good points that he makes? I have never bought the "fer me or agin me" mindset this thread sometimes takes on. I can see two sides to this argument and I support and criticize arguments accordingly. Just because I acknowledge a good point that Chris may make doesn't mean I agree with everything he says. I am content for Mojo to go about his business as he sees fit and I have so stated. You should be treating that as a win rather than spitting in my face. At least in the past when he would butter you up, he got a little slap on the wrist. I can tell the difference between being buttered up and sharing points of agreement. Points? the points that I lash are "beside the point." No, they aren't, not all of them, at any rate. You're so exercised over defending yourself and your buddy that your brain has shorted out. I am called a liar, by you .... I didn't call you a liar. I suggested my my use of that old saying that you are either ignorant about statistics or you are grasping at straws asserting that the 70% argument makes your case. I patiently explained to you why those data are worthless. Then Chris did the same. You blew us off. But the truth is that we're correct but you've treated our challenge as "beside the point." You have not responded to either of us on the substance of that challenge. Especially if mojo believes the same things the author of that article believes... I even argued to Chris that Mojo really believes this and that belief is relevant even if it is incorrect. I do not agree with everything that you have said or that Mojo thinks. But I am content for him to practice undisturbed. Never said otherwise. What the hell do you want from me?