Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (20433)	9/23/2003 1:26:23 PM
From: lorne	Respond to of 23908

...."This politically correct stuff is going to continue to get our guys killed," he said. "They're continuing to hide bombs, grenades and other stuff in those mosques.".... Guerrilla weapons reported in mosques Exiles say bombs, grenades stored, U.S. barred from searching holy sites September 23, 2003 WASHINGTON – A former Army intelligence analyst says a number of Iraqi exiles have reported the deposed regime stashed small missiles, weapons and ammunition at mosques in and around Baghdad. U.S. forces have confiscated large caches of weapons in raids of Iraqi homes, but they are barred from raiding religious sites. Guerrilla fighters continue to attack troops with mortars, grenades, homemade explosives and small arms fire on a daily basis. They are tapping into a huge arsenal left behind by the former regime, one that some military officials in Iraq fear could supply fighters for several years. Iraqi exiles from differing ethnic groups and religions have reported that mosques are the source of the seemingly endless supply of arms. "I've gotten enough reports that are almost identical from people who are independent from one another to figure there's some credence to it," said ret. U.S. Army Lt. Col. Stephen H. Franke, a former Iraq weapons inspector and Arabic translator who has debriefed Iraqi defectors. "They say they [remnants of Saddam Hussein's regime] are hiding arms in mosques, hiding stuff under mosques, hiding stuff in basements of mosques or storage rooms in mosques," added Franke, who recently returned to Iraq as a contractor. "They say they stashed small missiles, weapons and ammunition inside the mosques – stuff that would be a super no-no under the Geneva Convention, but they don't care." The Taliban also used mosques as arms depots, as well as command-and-control centers, during the Afghanistan conflict. Under the law of land war, religious properties cannot be used to shield military forces or equipment. If they are, such properties "may be targeted only if it is determined that an attack is a military necessity and meets a proportionality test," explained Pentagon spokesman Army Maj. Ted Wadsworth. "Targeting analyses for such objects should take into account the value to the civilian population of such objects and the harmful results of attacking such objects," he added. And they should also factor in their cultural and historical significance. In other words, Iraqi mosques are off-limits, says a U.S. Central Command official. "This politically correct stuff is going to continue to get our guys killed," he said. "They're continuing to hide bombs, grenades and other stuff in those mosques." More than 70 American troops have been killed by hostile fire in Iraq since President Bush declared an end to major combat operations there. Stockpiling weapons was part of a secret postwar plan by Saddam Hussein to sabotage the U.S. occupation. A Jan. 23 memo classified "Top Secret" and found in Iraqi intelligence files calls for, among other things, "purchasing stolen weapons from citizens" and "mobilizing of dependable elements and bringing them into mosques." worldnetdaily.com

To: Thomas M. who wrote (20433)	9/24/2003 5:02:32 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23908

Al-Sharq Al-Awsat Columnist: Arafat Should Go September 25, 2003 No.578 memri.org In her September 19, 2003 column in the London-based Arabic daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat titled , "Should Arafat Go?" columnist Huda Al-Husseini urged Arab countries and the Palestinian people to make it clear to Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat that by clinging to power, he is preventing a solution to the Palestinian problem. The following are excerpts from Al-Husseini'sarticle: [1] Arafat Has Become a Worn-Out Symbol That Has Lost Its Glory "Yes, [Arafat should go], but not by expulsion, murder, or any other form of intervention by Israel. "Why must Yasser Arafat leave his place in the Palestinian political arena? Because the Palestinian cause will never advance as long as he controls this arena. "The solution to this problem relies on international elements, the most prominent of which are the U.S. and Israel. Arafat is not wanted – neither by the U.S. nor, most certainly, by Israel. Moreover, he has lost his legitimacy even in the eyes of the Europeans, and he is criticized in the Arab world too. It is true that Arafat is a symbol. But he has become a worn-out symbol that has lost its glory. "In modern history, two prominent historic leaders have been symbols in the eyes of their people. The first was Nelson Mandela, who was imprisoned by South Africa's previous, racist regime – but no politician dared then to threaten to expel or kill him. The second leader was Xanana Gusmao, leader of the East Timor rebellion who was captured by the Indonesians. Then too, none of the Indonesian authorities dared to threaten him with expulsion or murder. "But with Arafat the situation is different, because Israel's policy of threatening him with expulsion or murder has again placed him in the limelight. This policy does not attest to strategic thought; it is a blunder [for Israel], which Arafat has not figured out how to use in favor of the Palestinian cause, or for the good of the Palestinian people – but [only] in his own favor. This is because he thinks that he is the Palestinian cause and the Palestinian cause is him." Arafat Turned His Back On a Palestinian State With East Jerusalem as Its Capital "Arafat's expulsion would be a mistake, and his murder would be considered a crime. [But] his blowing kisses or flashing a V-sign is no better. This meaningless sign blocks the light at the end of the tunnel. Arafat has missed many opportunities… the most recent and obvious of which was the plan presented to him by the previous U.S. president, Bill Clinton, in 2000. Instead of accepting an opportunity that would lead to the end of the Israeli occupation, he turned his back on a Palestinian state with east Jerusalem as its capital…" A Great Leader Knows When and How to Leave The Stage "Arafat's problem is that he wants to prove that nothing will be realized without him, [while] it is obvious that nothing will be realized with him. He wants to preserve [national] principles, while in reality this concept no longer exists. [In reality,] national principles are represented by international forces and capital. Today no international force supports Arafat, and on the other hand he has lost all his capital – except perhaps for his secret bank accounts. "There is another problem, for which the Arab countries are to blame. These countries are not openly telling Arafat the truth – which is that his insistence on remaining in the limelight will never bring about the realization of the Palestinians' aspirations. "What Arafat needs is for the Arab states and the Palestinian people to talk to him frankly. As long as Arafat is the only element in the Palestinian Authority, Israel will continue to take advantage of this weak point – by means of Sharon or anyone else. Those who are enthused by the V-sign Arafat flashes will never notice that the limelight is being shifted from the Palestinian cause, the doors are closing in front of them, the settlements are spreading and expanding, and the fence continues to be built and continues to swallow up land. "A great leader knows when and how to leave the stage – sometimes via his people, as happened to Winston Churchill, and sometimes via his wisdom, as happened to Nelson Mandela."