SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mph who wrote (11694)9/23/2003 12:29:27 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14610
 
i caught some of the arguments too...

i was quite impressed with justice kozinski....

guy looked too young to be a reagan appointee...

:)



To: mph who wrote (11694)9/23/2003 12:48:33 PM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14610
 
If 3 judges ruled one way and then all 11 judges from the same court unanimously overturn it, does that mean that the original 3 judges changed their votes? Or do the original three not get to participate in the rehearing?



To: mph who wrote (11694)9/23/2003 3:17:19 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
His comments were completely politico-speech,
which may be convincing to the masses, but which
sounded stupid to anyone with half a brain.


Should I infer that to at least 50% of the 9th Circuit bench his comments did not sound stupid?