Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (75428)	9/25/2003 3:59:25 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

That is TWICE you have responded to the same post. And TWICE you have done nothing except express your petulance, pique, and feeble lack of character! So why is a woman at risk from your touch? It is a simple question. Do you feel your evasiveness and hostile sputtering equates to honesty? Why do you feel incapable of being trustworthy toward your clients? Why is exclusion the only way you can hope not to violate client trust? How honest are you when you cannot even be honest with yourself...never mind to the rest of us?! Eagerly awaiting your evasion and your potty mouth response! I know you won't disappoint me by failing to meet my expectations! So why is a woman at risk around you? Do you have no impulse control? NO training? NO character? Are you unable to differentiate between professional and social--between therapy and sex--between respect and intrusiveness? Then, by all means...wear a chasity belt...because NOBODY shoud EVER be at risk in a fiduciary relationship. And the ONLY thing that can create risk in such a relationship is a person who falls short of the ethical standards expected of the professional and the mature of character. So why should a woman be at risk in your case? HUH? No need to answer! Just explode with your "honesty" and your "impartiality" and your "maturity" yet again! <gg>