SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wolf speed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (7280)9/24/2003 7:48:13 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10714
 
A defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is pretty commonplace. Only Eric's delusional state and the family intrigue distinguish it from the ordinary.

Most early-filed motions to dismiss are denied for a variety of reasons, including Courts' perceived need to allow Plaintiffs to engage in further discovery to prove their case, the perception of due process requiring plaintiffs their day in court, and the judges' desire not to be reversed on appeal.

Here, however, the plaintiff already has had four (4) bites at the apple, raised serious doubt about his own credibility, and given reason to believe that the Judge might be on to his personal and credibility problems and throw him out on his ear.



To: John Carragher who wrote (7280)9/24/2003 10:55:38 PM
From: Ron  Respond to of 10714
 
Thanks for the Durham Herald story.. that's the first update I've seen on that case lately.