Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bcrafty who wrote (82777)	9/24/2003 9:01:01 PM
From: Shack	Respond to of 209892

It should go this week.

To: bcrafty who wrote (82777)	9/24/2003 9:34:29 PM
From: mishedlo	Respond to of 209892

Jubak evidently felt that his featured names are less risky than tech based on P/Es, among other factors. Do you disagree with that aspect of his article? Based on PEs are a relative steal. First off they have one. Most of tech is a lie after options are taken into consideration. They have no earnings period. As for gold, with each rise in the POG miners the PE drops. Can gold get to $500? Why not? Why not 800? Why not 1200? Seriously, if EBAY can get to 117 and split, and AMZN can get back to 50 without EVER posting a profit in its entire existance, whay can't gold test the all time high? Wish we had more discussion on gold and silver here personally. I am long both gold and silver futures at the present. Covered with calls and will get called away tomorrow at 12:30 on the OCT gold/Silver close. However, I collected more premium with the CC's than just holding. Holding some futures in both silver and gold unhedged, but way more so in silver where I also entered some bull spreads in anticipation of being called away. 390 gold and 5.25 silver are my call points. M