Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob who wrote (464553)	9/25/2003 12:09:43 AM
From: steve dietrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

87 bil. could have paid for a lot of "human intelligence".

To: Bob who wrote (464553)	9/25/2003 12:13:04 AM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

What terrorists did we go after when we attacked Iraq and killed scores of innocent women and children? Saddam is not a terrorist. He may be a dictator but he is not a terrorist. Even Bush admitted that much, that Saddam and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 (links are all posted here). He did not have any WMDs, he was not a threat to us or anyone else. As far as being a brutal dictator, just look at all the brutal dictators that our US governments (Republicans especially) have supported and created. Pinochet, Noriega, Papadopoulos, Shah of Iran, Marcos, even Saddam and the list goes on... But you want a real threat? That's Bin Laden. Alive and well. Al-Qaida. Alive and well. N.Korea. Alive and well. There was no reason for us to go and kill and destroy innocent people. If anything, Bush CREATED terror and new terrorists. Cause I can tell you that if someone came and killed my children I would not stop till I had my revenge towards that person. So please, you sound smart enough to where I can think that I'm talking to a persona that can logically think for himself. At least I hope so...