Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chris714 who wrote (38836)	9/25/2003 1:21:06 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Respond to of 74559

He's probably betting on the outcome... Conservative guy phooey LOL..

To: chris714 who wrote (38836)	9/25/2003 7:21:50 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

Hi chris, <<NAT>> ... yup, I am now equally weighted in: NAT uk.finance.yahoo.com TK uk.finance.yahoo.com VLCCF uk.finance.yahoo.com ... and am wagering that the contract negotiations of NAT and VLCCF will turn out OK, while TK's business will hold together. I was not specifically aware of the <<5 days or so>> decision from BP on NAT. I am vaguely aware VLCCF knightsbridgetankers.com contract renewal issue for next year. All the ships are good for about 12-year productive life, before rusting, insurance premium and such factors make replacement economically sensible for the big oil firm customers. Chugs, Jay