Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuvo Research Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (12951)	9/26/2003 9:25:46 AM
From: axial	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14101

"I know there are people who have an intimate knowledge of how WF10 works and who feel that it may be of benefit if used EARLY in the infection." Yes. When the idea first surfaced, I was sceptical; you were an advocate. I now believe that you and others are right. I don't think WF10 would be a magic bullet, but that it would likely alleviate the worst aspects of SARS - not eliminate them, but diminish them. I believe that's true, not because WF10 would act against the coronavirus specifically, but because of WF10's ability to restore proper immune signalling. As you point out, in the context of toxic alternatives, safe, non-toxic WF10 is an attractive candidate. Maybe one day, Mark. Jim