Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Photography, Digital including Point and Shoot -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hoatzin who wrote (310)	9/26/2003 8:48:38 AM
From: Done, gone.	Respond to of 4530

Although the daguerreotype had virtues that paper photographs did not, it, like Betamax, died because the marketplace had its own priorities. Interesting article, but the above is not exactly correct. There is in fact not a single instance of any photographic process dying. Moved to the back burner, yes, but still cooking. For example, when it comes to daguerreotypes, many a modern practitioner out there making mercury vapor magic. Like these doods: daguerre.org daguerre.org The only photographic processes I know of that is in danger of dying is Dye Transfer. Blame Big Yellow: plaidworks.com

To: Hoatzin who wrote (310)	12/10/2003 12:25:40 PM
From: Done, gone.	Respond to of 4530

Arnold Newman: A Gift digitaljournalist.org

To: Hoatzin who wrote (310)	12/10/2003 12:29:16 PM
From: Done, gone.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4530

Aging in America, Ed Kashi digitaljournalist.org