Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (1067)	9/26/2003 11:28:15 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Respond to of 110194

FED STATS MISS HALF THE RECENT PRICE INCREASE By JOHN CRUDELE (New York Post) September 25, 2003 -- WASHINGTON got it half right. In the consumer inflation report released by the feds last week, the government picked up only about half of the recent 15 percent increase in gasoline prices. The big question now is: Will the rest of the gas hike be captured in the September consumer price index, or will it just disappear in the statistical grinder? If it is picked up, the government will risk giving Social Security recipients a decent cost-of-living hike next year. Social Security benefit increases are based on the three-month average overall rise in consumer prices for city wage earnings and clerical workers - the CPI-W, as the government calls it. So far, the CPI-W had a 2.0 percent annual increase in July and 2.1 percent increase in August. Social Security hikes were just 1.4 percent last year. A couple of other facts that the financial markets might find interesting or disturbing: * Without the use of geometric weighting - i.e., the theory that consumers will switch to burgers when steak gets too expensive - the annual inflation rate during August probably would have been 4.7 percent, more than twice the reported number. That's not what the markets want to hear. Most other reporters toed the party line that - if you exclude energy and food - costs showed the smallest 12-month increase since 1966. If only we could exclude food and energy costs from our family budgets. * Real earnings in August declined 0.3 percent, meaning that even though the government says inflation is low people still aren't keeping up. That's the second drop in five months. * All of the government's numbers, of course, are adjusted for seasonality. Which makes this sentence in the government CPI report all the more interesting: "The unadjusted data are of primary interest to consumers concerned about the prices they actually pay," the report says (my emphasis). Washington may finally be getting the idea that people don't like a heavy dose of razzmatazz with their economic numbers. nypost.com

To: mishedlo who wrote (1067)	9/26/2003 11:45:28 AM
From: russwinter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

<buy all the gold and silver you can stomach.> I did that last spring, and in 2002, and 2001. As I've been writing, I think gold and gold stocks are in a different, funny spot right now: too much bullish sentiment, too many specs long, a little too popular, and some games and curve balls coming. It's a timing thing for me, although I sure still buy the fundamental case. Actually the sector to get aggressive on right here and now is energy (black gold), not yellow gold. Meanwhile a mid-day note on day four (of five) of the market plunge. Big repo action up to net 29b, so they (Fed, PPT) are pulling out some stops. bullandbearwise.com Egregiously irresponsible, what can we say or do? Unfortunately, if you're a bear like me, you have to respect the fact that this tends to stave things off for awhile. Secondly, big surge in put buying this morning, and that's not good. cboe.com I'm committed to my shorts (as I see a decent chance for a sigma ten here), so I'll just take a little 5% trading portion off the table. For those looking to get short, take notice of the problem right now.