Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (75625)	9/26/2003 11:53:16 AM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I would have done something more productive with my time. Well, I personally didn't think my posts were such a waste of time, since I believed the issue was tolerance not blame, and I find your comment rude and insulting. However, I apologize for wasting your time. It won't happen again.

To: Neocon who wrote (75625)	9/26/2003 12:38:40 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

The scenario, as presented in full, certainly gave the distinct impression that Aunt K was significantly and noticeably out of sync with the other guests, and intentionally so. Karen's pulling back now and saying in essence "well, it really was just like a pants suit except for the fabric, and it was all a nice color coordinated black" is, IMO, changing the scenario to benefit her preferred position. Of course, since another poster here was recently doing the same thing, I suppose it's not surprising. But it really does make it a bit unfair on those who are discussing scenarios as presented and get attacked because the scenario changes in ways to make their positions look unreasonable.