Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (75661)	9/26/2003 1:41:50 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Note that the Auntie does not profess either religious grounds nor cogent philosophical grounds for her practice. Jewel explicitly denied religious grounds for Mojo. He declined to go for the religious exemption I offered and said that Mojo wasn't a religious fellow. He explicitly denied the cultural grounds as well, although I think an Islamic tradition was a reasonable assumption on my part given that the guy's name is Mohammed. Philosophical ground--like "avoiding sexually charged situations?" That's significantly sounder than Auntie's claim that ties and high heels cause crankiness and trigger social discord? I merely observe that it seems unduly provocative and therefore rude for Auntie not to at least wear "casual chic", which I cannot believe would have caused such consternation........ Turning away a client because of that individual's group identity is less provocative than casual clothing at a wedding?