Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (175429)	9/26/2003 7:14:11 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579060

No the distinctions are important. They didn't hint that Saddam was behind 9/11, and in fact their was no evidence to suggest that Saddam had a role in 9/11. They did suggest that Saddam had links to Al Qaida and in fact their is weak uncertain evidence of a possible minor, low level, former connection. If you want to say that they spun this connection a bit hard then that might be true but they didn't say anything that seems to be a flat out lie in this area. They also strongly said that Iraq had connections to terrorism. And indeed there is a lot of evidence of such connections. Tim