SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (175470)9/30/2003 11:39:32 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578933
 
Tim, do you really think I am that stupid?

No, although if I didn't know you better I might thinks so due to your lack of understanding of such a basic and important distinction.

Besides........do you really think Americans sat there and discerned between "there COULD be links between al Qaeda and Saddam", or "there were meetings REPORTED between al Qaeda and Saddam", or "al Qaeda and Saddam and al Qaeda MAY have been working together"? Americans had no reason to do that because they thought that their president was telling the truth.

The statements in quotes in the paragraph above are the truth.

Cheney, for one, did say that there was a connection between Saddam and 9/11..........on national tv.

He said there was a link between Saddam and Al-Qaida, specifically between Saddam's intelligence services and Atta. While many now think that the source for that information is unreliable, its not like Cheney made up the claim.

You keep trying to defend the indefensible.

I'm not even really defending anything. You keep trying to accuse the administration of saying one thing, when they really said another.

Tim