Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (75798)	9/27/2003 5:26:25 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Here's an interesting take on taking responsibility. Personally, I'm Fully Responsible By Dusty Horwitt Sunday, September 28, 2003; Page B02 Imagine that you are an elementary school teacher. On one of the first days of school, as your class is lining up for recess, one of your students shoves another. What do you instruct the guilty party to say to his classmate? a) I'm sorry. b) I'm sorry and I won't shove you again. c) I take full responsibility for my actions. If you were following the example of many of our nation's leaders, "c" would be your clear choice. Why teach our children the art of the simple apology, perhaps accompanied by a sincere promise to change their ways, when they can aim so much higher? When people in public life get in trouble these days, they are taking their responsibility to the max. For example, when it came to light last month that the Rev. Alvin O'Neal Jackson of the District had delivered another minister's sermons as his own, he said: "I take full responsibility for what I've done." No doubt that was a relief to those in his congregation who worried that he might take only partial responsibility. Former Enron treasurer Ben Glisan Jr. was a bit more tentative in holding himself accountable at his Sept. 11 sentencing hearing. He told the judge, "I think I would simply like to say that I take full responsibility for my actions." Glisan was undoubtedly more decisive when he helped create those illegal financing schemes at the now-infamous energy conglomerate. Particularly serious situations require particularly redundant language. At a July 30 news conference, President Bush was asked if he took "personal responsibility" for his State of the Union statement that Saddam Hussein had tried to buy nuclear fuel in Africa -- a claim later determined to have been based on faulty intelligence. Bush not only obliged, he went further: "I take personal responsibility for everything I say, of course. Absolutely." That may sound a bit obvious. But remember, this is the White House, where aides fall over themselves to take responsibility so the president doesn't have to. "Taking responsibility" has an enormous appeal for those in the spotlight. It sounds strong and forthright, but it means . . . well, what does it mean? It doesn't mean that you're sorry. It doesn't mean that you're admitting to a mistake. It doesn't mean that you believe you should have done something differently. It mostly means that you are trying to shut off any more discussion. But as Bush would say, make no mistake: Taking responsibility has become a full-fledged epidemic. In the past 12 months, just in the pages of The Post, the phrase "I take full responsibility" has come out of the mouths of, among others, Al Gore (for his election loss), Trent Lott (for his comments at Strom Thurmond's birthday party), New York Times sports columnist Ira Berkow (for not making sure a column gave credit to another writer's work) and Boeing pilot Richard "Buzz" Nelson (for ditching the company's oldest flyable airliner into the water near Seattle after it ran out of fuel during a farewell flight). Some people are even taking responsibility for things that they can't possibly be responsible for. After the Redskins' loss last Sunday, wide receiver Laveranues Coles said: "I take full responsibility for everything that happened. Our guys made some mistakes, but if I had gotten us off to a better start, things would have worked out differently." That was a big relief, no doubt, to teammate Chris Samuels. After he was called for holding -- negating a touchdown pass -- he probably thought, "Hey, it's not my fault. I wouldn't need to hold this guy if Laveranues were playing better." Perhaps Coles was infected by the words of Chicago White Sox manager Jerry Manuel, who said the same weekend, "When we don't play well, I take full responsibility." He's the boss, but it makes me feel sorry for players on other teams who have to worry that striking out or making an error is their own doing. But the clearest sign that a new cultural shift is underway came when the unlikely combination of the words "Mick Jagger" and "responsible" appeared in the same story last week. The Rolling Stones' notorious bad boy, discussing his two failed marriages, told a Swiss newspaper that "I am responsible for the consequences" of being unfaithful to his two wives. Of course, being "responsible for the consequences" might be Jagger's way of saying "having a bloody good time freed from the shackles of matrimony." Undoubtedly, we haven't seen the end of this trend. But maybe I'm wrong. If so, I can state categorically that I will take complete as well as personal responsibility for any and all mistakes of fact or interpretation in this article. Meanwhile, if you're not sure what to say the next time you're on the hot seat, you might recall the immortal words of Harry Truman: "I take full responsibility for the buck stopping here." Author's e-mail: dustyhorwitt@yahoo.com Dusty Horwitt is a lawyer and writer who lives in Bethesda. © 2003 The Washington Post Company