Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3087)	9/28/2003 1:01:44 AM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 20039

re: I doubt you work for the SEC I do not work for sec and I never said I did. What I said is that I was registered with sec as an investment professional re: You're just not educated enough....well..... Wanna bet.... <gggggg> re: means "LESS THAN" no, really, you don't say <gggggggg> re: And what about other factors like reception. the other factor? and what was the 1st one again? <gggggg> re: That is a company advertisement, not a scientific study. no, that is a hardware specs

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3087)	9/28/2003 2:08:33 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 20039

So the specs are "less than" 60,000 ft. How much less than. Sidney? I are a inginer. As such, I know how an engineer reads and writes that. (BTW, the section of that link that that is in are known as "specifications", not "advertisement. Not that it matters. Legal liability is assumed when a company puts something like that in an ad, too.) What that means is that the phone should work at ant altitude up to 60,000 ft. Like, say, 59,999 ft. That is a company advertisement, not a scientific study. Those specs had best be based on engineering analysis and testing.