To: JohnM who wrote (9701 ) 9/29/2003 4:35:38 AM From: unclewest Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793843 First, as money from the federal government to the states has declined, states and, for that matter, local governments, have had to cut funding for a great many things, among them "first responders" to use the larger category. John, I can agree that some states have serious fiscal problems...but I would luv to see you provide sources to support that comment. Surprise! I have the opposite view. (EDIT) So does your governor..."I am pleased that federal funding is flowing to our first responders, where it can be used to help protect New Jerseyans," Governor McGreevey said."state.nj.us The states' fiscal woes are based on declining state income and sales tax revenues and increases in giveaways...not federal spending cuts. Several states like CA have been expanding giveaway programs even as their income was dropping. The federal cuts to states you mentioned are simply not true. First, the 2003 budget contained large increases in state support, then GWB proposed a supplemental of $20 Billion for the states this year and it passed. That $$$ is in addition to extra federal funds distributed for Homeland Security issues like first-responders. Congress doled out a record $4.4 Billion to the states for first responders this year. Those funds have been allocated and must be obligated by Nov 1. For example...here is a list of grants just to NYC.dhs.gov If as you inferred, the states are cutting spending for first responders it is NOT DUE to cuts in federal spending. There have been no such cuts in my state. And I don't believe there have been any in NJ either. "New Jersey budgeted $25 million in state funds for a $52 million plan to get its public health system ready to deal with bioterrorism threats such as anthrax. The rest will come from federal sources." The Port Authority of NY and NJ..."Of all public agencies, the Port Authority was among the hardest hit by the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. But Ronis says the tragedy hasn’t derailed port plans for marine- terminal redevelopment, other than causing officials to pledge an additional $40m in expenditures over the next five years to improve terminal security." " Since the mid-1990s, the federal government has made grants available to state and local agencies to provide specialized planning, training, and equipment needed for those terrorist incidents with unusual circumstances (particularly disasters involving weapons of mass destruction). So far in 2003, $3.9 billion has been allocated for such grants; the president has requested an additional $3.5 billion for 2004, approximately a tenfold increase from the pre--September 11 spending levels." uwwashingtontechnology.com In fiscal 2003, including the recently signed emergency supplemental funding, nearly $34 billion is being provided, a "staggering" 22 percent increase, he said.govexec.com State Tax revenue slowing again.stateandlocalgateway.rockinst.org State Budgetary Assumptions in 2003 — States Cautiously Projecting Recoverystateandlocalgateway.rockinst.org The $20 billion federal fiscal relief proved to be critical in helping states with their budget woes. Half of this money is in the form of increased Medicaid payments, earmarked to assist the states in paying for the recent strong growth in this program’s cost. The other half is in general fiscal aid, available for any purpose the states wish.stateandlocalgateway.rockinst.org For papers on the state financial story go to this link...stateandlocalgateway.rockinst.org