SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (466201)9/28/2003 8:12:22 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
>>HA! Sorry, no matter how much you wish it were so, the count proved GWB was the winner. More importantly, the location of Bush's total vote proves his small margin victory was located throughout the country rather than almost exclusively in urban areas like Al Gore.<<

Ann -

Hard to believe this is still being discussed. Harder still to believe that anyone could look at the numbers and claim Bush actually got more votes.

Nationally, Bush got 50,456,002 votes, which amounted to 47.87% of the total.

Gore got 50,999,897 votes, which amounted to 48.38% of the total.

In Florida, the margin of "victory" was within the margin of error of ANY counting method you could possibly devise, so it's simply not factually correct to say that anyone won that state.

Just the facts, Ma'am.

And by the way, is there something wrong with the people in urban areas? Should we not consider their votes to be as important as the votes of people in small towns and rural areas?

- Allen

PS: Only 51.3% of the voting age population cast ballots in 2000.

Source: infoplease.com