Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3136)	9/28/2003 7:31:07 PM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 20039

You are no Libertarian. Coming from you, that judgement isn't terribly affecting. What you are I can't say because of TOU. Oh, no! Well, I'm not surprised that playground epithets and scatological words are all you've got left. Then again, you could always revisit either (a) posting links to the same six or seven absurd websites you're so enamored with or (b) start insisting, again, that various individuals purchase those videotapes. LPS5

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3136)	9/28/2003 7:51:11 PM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

There really aren't many real libertarians around anyway. You'd have to look in the upper reaches of Alaska or other far away places to find people who actually live on their own without the benefits of collectivist society that libertarians suppossedly find some offensive and want to avoid. I've gone through the whole debate routine with liberatrians. They're mainly a bunch of idealists who have no grounding in how the real world works. For example, if we had libertartian roads, we'd have to pay a toll everytime we turned down a new street, to pay the owners for the use of their roads. How many people would prefer that method of paying for our roads? Libertarianism in the abstract is a beautiful idea, but it's a utopian idealogy like anarchy that's about as practical as pure communism (the diametrically oppossed philosophy) is in the real world. The real world operates somewhere in between these two extremes. Another fallicy of the libertarian idealogy is the belief in the superiority of the purely "free markets". Big Business and the wealthy elites who own them aren't really interested in "free markets" anyway. They never really have been, they've used the government to protect their industries from competition since the founding of this country. Look at all the federal largese that they're living off of under the suppossedly "free market" Republican party under Bush and his cronies in Congress. Big Business loves government subsidies and giveaways. It's like being a kid in the candystore. So much for "free markets". Free spending government is more like it.