SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve dietrich who wrote (466640)9/29/2003 2:40:27 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
RIGHTS AND THE NEW REALITY
Telemarketer Terrorists?
Scam artists and drug dealers aren't sympathetic
characters. But it's more than stretching the point to call
them terrorists. Why, then, have federal investigators
used a provision of the USA Patriot Act to go after
telemarketers accused of swindling elderly consumers,
a lawyer accused of stashing stolen funds in a Belize
bank account and various drug dealers?

Two years ago, lawmakers wanted to do something to
help Americans feel safer. What they did was approve
a number of ill-advised changes to federal law, many of
which they'd previously rejected for tilting the balance in
our criminal justice system way too far toward
prosecutors.

When civil libertarians and ordinary citizens sounded
alarms about the broad new powers the Patriot Act
gave the FBI and other law enforcement agencies to
spy on law-abiding Americans, Atty. Gen. John
Ashcroft said, in effect, trust us, we won't trample
anyone's constitutional rights.

That trust now appears misplaced. Not only is the Justice Department using the
law to go after ordinary criminal defendants, the attorney general has largely
stonewalled Congress' questions about how he has used these new powers.

Rather than support reasonable amendments, now before Congress, that would
fine-tune the law to prevent civil liberties abuses, Ashcroft and President Bush are
asking for even more permission to spy, detain and prosecute. For the last several
months, Ashcroft denied he was preparing new legislation, even after a draft copy
was leaked in February. Now, with this month's 9/11 anniversary, he and Bush
are pushing that hodgepodge of dreadful ideas, popularly dubbed Patriot II.

Should Congress be reckless enough to pass this package, yet to be introduced,
FBI agents would gain unprecedented power to rifle through people's desk
drawers and force testimony without proving they even had probable cause to
suspect criminal activity. Congress wisely rejected this proposal two years ago.
The administration wants to require judges — not just permit them — to deny
bail to many defendants and perhaps to authorize stripping citizenship from any
American who provides support to any group that Ashcroft designates a "terrorist
organization."

Just as Bush and Ashcroft have refused to detail how their current enforcement
tools have made Americans safer, they have failed to make a case for more
changes. Instead, the attorney general has indulged his nasty habit of slamming
critics as hysterics or near-traitors. Librarians are his latest target, for objecting to
a Patriot Act provision allowing federal agents to peruse the records of library
users and book buyers.

Yet librarians, among many others, have reason to fear that Patriot I has already
upended constitutional safeguards against unreasonable searches and railroaded
trials. Patriot II would do even more damage.

CC