SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavesM who wrote (9879)9/29/2003 6:29:32 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793784
 
we used to have to be very careful to remove water vapor from our samples

One of the points I see consistently mentioned in critiques of the "Computer Modeling" that is being done on "Global Warming" is that the studies don't give the changes in Cloud cover enough weight. "Increase in warming would lead to increase in cloud cover which would decrease warming" is the typical comment.
Welcome aboard, DM!



To: DavesM who wrote (9879)9/29/2003 10:20:52 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793784
 
p.s. Regarding switching from a carbon to a hydrogen economy... water vapor (product of carbon and hydrogen combustion) is also a greenhouse gas.

Isn't water vapor by far the chief greenhouse gas? like 80% or 90%? I remember reading something to that effect.



To: DavesM who wrote (9879)9/30/2003 9:58:02 PM
From: AK2004  Respond to of 793784
 
DavesM
I was not aware of that factor, thank you
-Albert


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News