Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (175627)	9/30/2003 5:32:54 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579244

Yes, and this president asked for and got another tax cut this past spring and is planning to ask for another one this fall. What does that tell you about the quality of this presidency? Its one thing that is a positive sign about the quality of this presidency. LOL! The half trillion deficit primarily is due to tax cuts. If you want to disagree with me why start out with yes. It doesn't make much sense when I say something and then you say Yes and then the opposite of what I say. Maybe you should go back and read what you wrote. I was basically agreeing with the points you made in the paragraph above and then I added my own point. If you have any argument, its would be with my use of grammar. It may have been better for me to say "Yes, but" instead of "Yes, and". Let me know if you want us to start picking at each other's grammar. As I stated before tax cuts are the smallest of the three factors. The bigger ones are spending increases, and reduced revenue from an economy that has not done as well as expected. And my point is.........if you already know revenues are down and you can't control the spending by your own party, why would you go in for more tax cuts? Logic tells you that the situation will only worsen. ted