SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (10014)9/30/2003 2:31:16 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793721
 
They shouldn't let people drive without auto insurance.

The problem is you can't stop the guy you need to. Mr "Much Bucks" carries insurance. The poor guy doesn't, and says "sue me!" This is classic in California when you get hit by a Mexican, legal or illegal. The state is not about to prosecute them and jail them for it. The Jails are bursting already. The Police just shrug their shoulders.



To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (10014)9/30/2003 6:21:26 PM
From: NickSE  Respond to of 793721
 
I'm all for enforcement. My issue is with the ridiculous quadrupling of current fines basically meant to build revenues to cover budget gaps.

Enforcing proof of insurance is a good thing. They shouldn't let people drive without auto insurance.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News