SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (468716)10/1/2003 3:09:07 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 769670
 
Chinks in Bush's armour revealed


By Jonathan Marcus
BBC defence correspondent

The White House has denied that a senior adviser to President
George W Bush disclosed the identity of an undercover Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer in an attempt to punish her
husband who had criticised intelligence relating to Iraq.

But with Democrats demanding an
independent investigation of the
whole affair it only serves to
highlight the president's growing
vulnerability.

Iraq, the economy and the dynamics
of the Democratic Party all serve to
underscore the president's problems,
making him a man who could be
beaten in 2004.

Mr Bush is building a mighty war
chest to fight the next presidential
election. He will be able to outspend his opponents many times over.

Battle ahead

Nevertheless, even in Republican circles there is a growing glimmer of
unease - a sense that the president is becoming more embattled as the
election campaign comes closer.

With jobs still being lost, almost daily casualties in Iraq and the
possibility, at least, that the Democrats might select a potential winner,
next year's presidential race is moving from the dead certainty of a
second Bush victory into a battle that Mr Bush may have to fight hard to
win.

Last Thursday evening, at a dinner in
New York, I listened to the
Democratic candidates who hope to
contest the presidency in 2004.

All eyes were on the newest runner -
former general Wesley Clark.
Anticipation mounted. And a few
moments into the general's speech
there was an almost audible sigh of
relief from the hundreds of party
faithful in the audience.

That sigh said one thing - here was a
man who could indeed beat Mr Bush in the presidential race.

Flawed strategy

Mr Clark's strongest card is his military background - an immunisation
against the now commonplace assertion that the Democrats are
somehow weak on national security and defence.

But Mr Clark's opportunity is born out of the president's very real
problems.

This latest row over the alleged naming of an undercover CIA operative
goes to the heart of the Bush machine - it is Karl Rove, his strategic
master-mind who, it is claimed, was at fault.

The whole episode serves yet again to highlight the problem of
intelligence interpretation prior to the Iraq war. And, as the death toll
mounts in Iraq and reserve servicemen and women face ever longer
tours of duty, it is a problem that will not go away.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (468716)10/1/2003 4:17:13 PM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"Well, then you've already lost your bet...."

Who did what then, and when? Until you can answer that you are just parroting the demo hater Wilson (and the demo party line in general). Good Boy, Daschle would say.

"at least 6 reporters have claimed they were contacted"

This is what the confirmed liar and Bush hater Wilson says. So far, none of these contacted or verified. I know that doesn't matter to you, but it does to smart (and fair) people.