Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (76029)	10/1/2003 5:30:54 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

...and would never ever ever refer anyone to his "services" He is grateful... And he is amused that karens concern is that he is "sheltered." As karen has discribed the life she has created for her self, I have found her to be the single most sheltered, risk-averse adult that I have ever encountered. ... he is also amused that you are concerned that he might be "mentally disturbed."

To: Solon who wrote (76029)	10/1/2003 5:38:46 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Society does not owe Moho a particular job in a particular way. Society does not owe Mojo a particular job, and I would not suggest that it has to give it to him. However suggesting that the government not take it away from him is not suggesting that it owes him that job. Not allowing him to practice a job where he has willing clients and is not harming anyone is an example of the government taking action against him. It is not just a case of society or the government not giving him something because society does not owe it to him. I have already said that I agree with a service provider refusing to see clients when he believes he is unqualified to reasonably guarantee that he will not breech client trust or engage in misconduct. So I support Moho. OK, then perhaps we don't disagree as much as I thought. Tim