Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (76039)	10/1/2003 5:53:19 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 82486

Mojo was refusing to provide his services to people who presumably could get similar service elsewhere. Auntie K (depending on how inappropriate her dress was, if it wasn't all that inappropriate then there is no real issue with her) was going to an important function for a number of people and possibly distressing them. Mojo's services are his own business and in deciding who to take on as a client and not take on as a client he is dealing with his own business. Auntie K, if her dress is sufficiently inappropriate (At some point in the conversation it seems that it may have been established that it really isn't all that inappropriate but since there is no issue if it is not I will assume for this post that it is) was getting involved in the business of others. OTOH we have Mojo, who would have to actually articulate his views to anyone who stopped by for a massage but didn't meet his criteria. Not necessarily but it might be considered dishonest if he did not. Tim