To: lorne who wrote (21154 ) 10/3/2003 12:26:48 AM From: AK2004 Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21614 re: 'If two Muslims fight with their swords and kill each other, the place of both the killer and the killed is in Hell.' and yet public stoning and ritual killing of the female children is ok. re: When the Prophet was in Mecca, he had no army, and therefore he could not declare Jihad… that is, when there was a state of enmity between Muslims and the polytheists and there was harm caused to the believers by the polytheists, all the Prophet ordered his comrades to do was to say: 'You have your religion and we have our religion.' seems like religious tolerance is allowed only when the other side is stronger and otherwise it is death to infidels - that alone should scare infidels that is us re: This is because in Palestine there is an enemy that rules the land. This rule is considered a crime by international conventions and resolutions… he is not talking about infidel's laws but international law of koran, of course. re: But permitting his blood does not mean that he must be killed; it only permits his killing. I am confused, is he implying that killing Israeli children is some sort of sport for bloodthirsty muslims re: Question: "The foreigner, in general, even if he fights the Muslims, when he enters the Muslim lands and receives a visa – does this visa guarantee his protection?" Sheikh Gum'a: " Yes, even if he is a Harbi." I guess he can not make up his mind since infidels are stronger re: It is Forbidden for a Muslim in the U.S. Military To Fight His Brother well, we should enlist all of the muslims and whoever would refuse to shoot at enemies of US should be viewed as traitor and be treated as such