SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (76156)10/2/2003 10:46:26 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Interesting perspective. But can't systemic discrimination be just as present if twenty massage therapists individually set up "straights only" shops as if just one shop with twenty masseurs does it? After all, we don't let an individual who is selling their house refuse to sell to a black or a jew even if they're only one person. So I'm not sure the "I'm just one person" defense works for me.

But as to competing principles, absolutely. There are almost ALWAYS competing principles, often competing constitutional rights. That's one of the fascinating things about being a lawyer. While many non-lawyers think the law is cut and dried and all you have to do is argue the law, the reality is that in many cases it's competing public policies that are at issue, and you have to present a compelling case for your client's public policy interests trumping the other party's.



To: Lane3 who wrote (76156)10/2/2003 5:50:12 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
The purpose of the non-discrimination policy, IMO, is to obviate systemic discrimination in our society, which is a violation of equal protection under law.

Not a bad stab at the purpose IMO, but why would it violate equal protection under the law if the discrimination is not in the form of laws, regulations, or any government action?

Tim