Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (10310)	10/2/2003 1:04:25 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793704

No, John, there has been no crime until someone confesses to it, pleads guilty, or is found guilty by a judge or jury. Nope, c2, you are confusing two steps. First step--a crime was committed, someone was murdered, a house was broken into, the name of a covert CIA agent was leaked to the media. Second step--who commited the crime. That's the process you are talking about.

To: carranza2 who wrote (10310)	10/2/2003 4:47:23 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793704

Yes...like diplomatic parties, entertaining Wilson's guests from the Middle East, interviews with them...ALL sorts of ways, particularly if Wilson was so proud of his new 3rd wife, that he flaunted her maiden name on his Bio on the internet. There are lots of non-criminal ways that Novak may have known that she was employed by the CIA--it could have been an open secret in DC; she may have told him; there could have been an innocent disclosure; or, more likely, Novak may have simply put two and two together