Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (76209)	10/2/2003 7:11:32 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I think that constitutes clarity. I didn't say you agreed with Mojo's approach. I do understand that you think there are competing interests, society's interest in people not being excluded from full participation on the basis of gender, race, etc., and the individual's interest in providing services and association in ways that are comfortable to them (or in comformity with their beliefs), that when those in the second category were few or insignificant in their effect their interests could be allowed to prevail, but when they became sufficient in number of size that their impact began to be meaningful (my words, I understand, not yours, but I'm trying to clarify what I heard you say) then they could be made to sacrifice their own interests to those of society. That's the point of clarity I thought we had reached. Not so?