Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (10372)	10/2/2003 3:38:34 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793698

Novak claims he went to the WH to find out why they appointed a Dem partisan to investigate the WMD claim. The WH told him it was because the guy's wife at CIA pushed him. If the wife had been telling friends, neighbors and assorted cocktail party acquaintances that she worked as an energy analyst at the CIA (as Wilson says today in the NYT), where is the crime?

To: Rascal who wrote (10372)	10/2/2003 5:16:00 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793698

No, that's not what I said. Perhaps you and John need to take an elementary reading course. For the umpteenth time, I said that there's no proof that a criminal violation has taken place, particularly as those who are certain that one has occurred have no idea as to what the standard of behavior is. Evidently, you are included within that not insignificant group of the ignorant. "Often wrong but never in doubt" should be written in your heraldic shield. I've said it's wrong and against all we stand for as citizens of a formerly great country to conclude at this stage of things that a crime has been committed. I've said that it would help all the folks around here who think (and convict) with their viscera instead of their brains to read the statute and reflect on its purpose, instead of blowing it out of their collective cloacas.