Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (76267)	10/2/2003 5:33:57 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Very gut wrenching report. There is so much political value in arguing over the issue that we sometimes lose sight of the simple fact that the parents are experiencing loss and that it can be devastating.

To: Lane3 who wrote (76267)	10/2/2003 7:24:19 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Thanks for trying to move the thread on to new topics. That particular one isn't one I have much to say on, but let's try to see whether we can't move on from the Mojo issue, which has really morphed into fighting about who said what about who said what about who said what about Mojo. Did I post this link to a Washington Supreme Court case that came down today? courts.wa.gov Very interesting issues, and happen a lot, about what to do when teenagers of divorced parents decide to exercise their teenagereness and resist visiting the nonresident parent. Should we force them to against their wills? And what about the parent who takes a little resistance and for their own purposes feeds it into open rebellion instead of being pragmatic and just saying, like going to the dentist, you may not like it, but you have to do it, so you might as well be positive about it.