Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (76270)	10/8/2003 10:46:47 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

siliconinvestor.com You would naturally see things from your own perspective. No criticism there. By the time you said some innoculous remarks against Chris and I, Jewels had already shot his load. Both Chris and I recognized that it was coming from the Muslim tradition that not only is adultery illegal--but that ALL instances which may LEAD to sex (such as mixing of the sexes, partial nudity, high heels, make-up, exposed skin, etc.) is both illegal and immoral under Islam. Not only is sex an impurity outside of marriage..but any set or setting which MIGHT lead to sex (exposing your elbow) is an impurity. I am sure you are aware that Jewels did not broach the subject for the reason that he is an intellectual pursuing issues of conscience that have nothing to do with religion (MOHO has no faith...LOL!). But he surely had a reason, didn't he??!!