Definitions of WMD
(Note: Why are so many Left and Left media only defining WMD as ...nuclear... maybe this will help....
nti.org
Produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
The most widely used definition of "weapons of mass destruction" in official U.S. documents is "nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons."
The U.S. president has used this definition in communications with Congress.
"Letter to Congressional Leaders Reporting on Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction," November 9, 2000, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, pp. 2842-2851.
"Statement on Domestic Preparedness Against Weapons of Mass Destruction," May 8, 2001, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, pp. 718-719.
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has used this definition in reporting on proliferation to Congress.
Unclassified Report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Related to Weapons of Mass Destruction, 1 January Through 30 June 2000.
The U.S. Department of Defense has used this definition in a series of major reports to Congress on proliferation threats and on measures for countering proliferation.
U.S. Department of Defense, Proliferation Threat and Response 2001, "Message of the Secretary of Defense," refers to weapons of mass destruction as those with "...capabilities to inflict mass casualties and destruction: nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapons or the means to deliver them." (page 4 on the screen)
U.S. Department of Defense, Proliferation Threat and Response 1997, "Message of the Secretary of Defense," refers to "Weapons of mass destruction . . . nuclear, biological, or chemical . . ."
The U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO), the investigative arm of Congress, has used this definition, as well.
U.S. General Accounting Office, Weapons of Mass Destruction: State Department Oversight of Science Centers Programs (May 10, 2001), opening letter to Senators Mitch McConnell and Patrick Leahy, describing the document as reviewing U.S. programs to help former Soviet scientists who once developed "nuclear, chemical and biological weapons systems."
Some U.S. laws likewise use this traditional definition of WMD.
The Weapons of Mass Destruction Control Act of 1992, Title XV of the Defense Authorization Act of 1993, P.L. 102-484 (enacted October 23, 1992), relates "to the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass destruction) and their related technology . . ."
This definition of WMD is also used internationally.
Guidelines for Sensitive Missile-Relevant Transfers of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) refers to WMD as "nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons."
However, some more recent U.S. laws, official statements, and documents define WMD as including additional types of weapons, such as radiological weapons or conventional weapons causing mass casualties. Often these laws and documents are focused on responding to possible WMD incidents in the United States.
The definition in the U.S. Code, Title 5, "War and National Defense," includes radiological weapons. It defines WMD as "any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of - (A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors; (B) a disease organism; or (C) radiation or radioactivity."
The Federal Bureau of Investigation sometimes uses an even broader definition of WMD: "A weapon of mass destruction (WMD), though typically associated with nuclear/radiological, chemical, or biological agents, may also take the form of explosives, such as in the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma in 1995. A weapon crosses the WMD threshold when the consequences of its release overwhelm local responders."
Further Reading: In an April 1998 article in Arms Control Today, Wolfgang Panofsky argues that the term weapons of mass destruction should be limited to nuclear weapons because of their unique destructive power. |
