Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve kammerer who wrote (2102)	10/4/2003 11:31:49 AM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 22250

You are doing exactly what you criticize me of doing. Read my previous posts. I believe the world is better off without Saddam. I believe the world should have eliminated for the reasons of his mass murder, rape, pillaging, torture of his own people and his neighbors. I don't believe, and that is my opinion, that Israel was a major beneficiary. I believe that they were incidental beneficiaries. In fact, Jordan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and others benefit more from his removal. Again, my opinions. Whether Saddam was a threat to us or not is a good question and I agree that the administration totally bungled the PR with the WMD thing. I still think it was good to get rid of him for the reasons stated above. However, we should have done more to get the world to come with us and there is blame to pass around there to France, Russia, as well as our own nation.