SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: orkrious who wrote (262731)10/4/2003 1:24:16 PM
From: orkrious  Respond to of 436258
 
gold-eagle.com

more good stuff from gold eagle today

A TACTICAL WARHEAD FIRED AT GOLD BULLS

Chris Temple, Editor
The National Investor
www.nationalinvestor.com

For the second time in eight days, a gold market that stubbornly refused to follow a certain script was suddenly undermined today by sudden, heavy and organized selling pressure. At the close of trading in New York, the cash contract settled out at a level of $368.70 per ounce, down by nearly $14.00 per ounce for the day.

The explanation given for the yellow metal's sudden swoon by most of the Establishment financial press was an allegedly bullish report released this morning by the Labor Department. It showed that-while the official unemployment rate remained flat at 6.1 per cent-the U.S. economy added jobs for the first time in eight months. The addition of 57,000 non-farm positions came as a surprise to Wall Street, which had expected a further reduction of 30,000 non-farm jobs and a small up tick in the unemployment rate. Naturally, this was seized on by stock market bulls as proof that the economy would gain further steam; never mind that, along with this statistic, the government's figures showed declining wages, and a downward revision of some 150,000 jobs believed to have existed earlier this year. Never mind as well that virtually all of the other economic news released this week-lousy consumer sentiment numbers, sharp declines in durable goods orders and more-flies in the face of this single jobs report.

Though Wall Street stock prices spiked higher with the opening bell this morning, gold was actually higher itself for a spell, hitting an intra-day peak of $386.70 per ounce and holding most of its modest gains for better than two hours after trading started. Clearly, gold traders were keeping their eyes on the "big picture" of a U.S. dollar in a secular decline and an economy inherently weaker than the shills on financial television claim. Or, maybe, most of them simply showed up to work at the COMEX a few hours late. I'll let you decide.

Whatever the case, late morning trading saw a sudden drop in gold that quickly began to feed on itself. According to some floor traders, a break below the $380.00 per ounce level triggered both stop loss selling by hedge funds and similar sorts, as well as some new attempts by short sellers to shake out some bulls. The metal in scarcely an hour's time dropped almost uninterrupted, making a weak stand in the closing moments as gold tried to hold near its 50 day moving average around the $370.00 per ounce level.

As I wrote in a September 25 commentary ("From Hand-to-Hand Combat, to Financial Thermonuclear War,") such volatility by itself is neither unusual nor unwelcome. While I'm sure gold bulls would like to see their favorite asset rise every day, a healthy and (long term) sustainable market won't behave in this fashion. Days like today shake gold and gold stock positions out of the weakest hands, and can set the stage for eventual attempts to make new highs.

Just as last Thursday, though, the timing and nature of today's selling strongly suggests that gold had received a "push" of sorts. Had gold dropped at the outset today, such a possibility could probably be dismissed; after all, that would have been expected. Since the metal held onto gains for fully half of its trading day, though, we must consider the alternative.

As I mentioned last week, an epic battle is at hand now as gold has pounded on the door of new bull market highs. Recent days have also seen a pivotal juncture for the value of the U.S. dollar, which in the last two days in particular has seen its level drop back to its 2003 lows plumbed in June. Both trends have been both desired and encouraged by monetary authorities. Both, however, have recently threatened to get out of hand, something which could quickly prove destabilizing to stock and bond markets.

To slow down the dollar's decline against the yen, Japanese authorities have been intervening massively in the currency markets. After all, were the dollar to decisively break below its 2003 lows here (a level of a bit over 92 on the U.S. Dollar Index) a cascade of technical selling-if not a full-fledged panic-would likely ensue. Such was the concern of this very thing happening this week that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York felt the need to assist Japanese officials in their intervention.

Similarly, a breakout to new highs for gold could easily undermine everything else as well, signaling that all really is not well with the world, the U.S. economy and the greenback. It too, therefore, must be at least postponed, if not prevented. The timing of today's lobbing of a "tactical nuclear warhead" at intransigent gold bulls argues that something more is at work than normal market activity, as the Fed-with all of its fingers and toes in the cracking monetary dike-tries to maintain appearances. In my view, though, this war is just getting started; and the long-term case for gold and for carefully-chosen gold equities remains as compelling as it's been in years.



To: orkrious who wrote (262731)10/4/2003 5:21:47 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Shaking the House of Cards

nytimes.com

No wonder the sky-high poll numbers for President Bush have collapsed. The fiasco in Iraq is only part of the story. The news on one substantive issue after another could hardly be worse. It's almost as if the president had a team in the White House that was feeding his credibility into a giant shredder.

Despite the administration's relentlessly optimistic chatter about the economy, the Census Bureau reported that the number of Americans living in poverty increased by 1.7 million last year, the second straight annual increase. During those two years, the number of poor Americans has grown by 3 million.

Belt-tightening is also in order for the middle class. The median household income declined by 1.1 percent, a drop of about $500, to $42,400. It was the second straight year for a decline in that category as well.

Per capita income decreased, too. It dropped by 1.8 percent, to $22,794 in 2002, the first decline in more than a decade.

Boom times these ain't.

On Monday we learned that there had been a steep increase last year -- the largest in a decade -- in the number of Americans without health insurance.
The international outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas is reporting that job losses in the U.S. have resulted in a sharp decline in the number of dual-income families, particularly for those with children under 18.

And so on.

With the federal government piling up massive deficits and local governments struggling to provide the most basic of services (some areas are closing schools; others are releasing prisoners prematurely), Mr. Bush is asking the nation to go much further into debt in the service of some vague notion of a civic renaissance in Iraq.

Even Republicans are beginning to ask what the heck is going on.
Contributing to the growing sense of unease in some quarters and outrage in others is the blatant war profiteering in Iraq by politically connected firms like Bechtel and Halliburton -- profiteering that is taking place with the scandalous encouragement and connivance of the Bush administration.

A front-page article in The Times on Tuesday said: "A group of businessmen linked by their close ties to President Bush, his family and his administration have set up a consulting firm to advise companies that want to do business in Iraq, including those seeking pieces of taxpayer-financed reconstruction projects."

Iraq is proving to be a bonanza for the Bush administration's corporate cronies even as it is threatening to become a sinkhole for the aspirations of ordinary Americans.
The vicious release to news organizations of the identity of an undercover C.I.A. officer could serve as a case study of the character of this administration. The Bush II crowd is arrogant, venal, mean-spirited and contemptuous of law and custom.

The problem it faces now is not just the criminal investigation into who outed Valerie Plame, but also the fact that the public understands this story only too well. Deliberately blowing the cover of an intelligence or law enforcement official for no good reason is considered by nearly all Americans, regardless of their political affiliations, to be a despicable act.

According to an ABC-Washington Post poll, nearly 70 percent of Americans believe a special counsel should be appointed to investigate the leak.
Now that so much has gone haywire -- Iraq, the economy, America's standing in the world -- the tough questions are finally being asked about President Bush and his administration.

Perhaps foreign policy was not Mr. Bush's strength, after all. And even diehard Republicans have been forced to acknowledge that the president was surely wrong when he insisted that his mammoth tax cuts would be the engine of job creation. And nothing has ever come of Mr. Bush's promise to be the education president, or to change the tone of the discourse in Washington, or to deal humbly and respectfully with the rest of the world.

Americans are increasingly asking what went wrong. How could so much have gone sour in such a short period of time?

Was it incompetence? Bad faith?

Loud warnings were ignored for the longest time. Now, finally, the truth is becoming more and more difficult to avoid.