SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (470957)10/4/2003 2:36:00 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Rush Hour 2
Everything else aside, as any Philly fan can tell you, Limbaugh is wrong about Donovan McNabb.
by Ed Walsh
10/03/2003 12:00:00 AM

LAST SUNDAY, on ESPN's pregame football telecast, conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh said that he doesn't think Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb has ever been all he's cracked up to be. He explained:

I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They're interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there's a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn't deserve. The defense carried this team.

What started as an eyebrow-raising statement quickly turned into a "tempest," as Limbaugh referred to it Wednesday on his radio show. Democratic presidential candidates Wesley Clark, Howard Dean, and Al Sharpton all criticized Limbaugh, calling his comments racist. And NAACP president Kweisi Mfume denounced both Limbaugh and ESPN, wondering why the network had a political commentator on its program to begin with (he may have a point there). NFL officials and players were none too happy either.

Late Wednesday, Limbaugh resigned his position on ESPN's "NFL Sunday Countdown." There are larger issues surrounding Limbaugh right now, but for the sake of beleaguered Philadelphia fans it's worth examining the original point: Limbaugh was wrong to criticize McNabb the way he did.

No, Limbaugh wasn't wrong to criticize McNabb's play. In fact, he was rather late to the game on that count. Everyone in Philadelphia spent the first three weeks of this football season wondering what's gone wrong with their superstar QB. One veteran Philly sports columnist recently wrote of the city's "collective despair over the performance of Donovan McNabb." McNabb himself has admitted that his performance in the first couple weeks of this season was sub-par. In fact Limbaugh was asked to comment on McNabb precisely because his fellow ESPN commentators had been discussing whether McNabb is living up to his billing as a top-flight quarterback.

But yes, Limbaugh was wrong to cast McNabb's success as a by-product of racial boosterism. And the proof is in the Philly fans.

DONOVAN MCNABB, like all pro athletes who play in Philadelphia, has seen his share of criticism from local fans and media. (In 1999 a local sports-talk station led a contingent of disgruntled fans to the ceremony when he was drafted with the #2 pick just so that they could boo him on national television--they wanted the Eagles to get Ricky Williams.) No one has tried to stifle the legitimate concerns that do exist. Is Donovan a good enough touch-passer? Can he stay in the pocket and deliver the ball with crisp precision? Or does he need to scramble and rely on his athletic prowess to get himself out of jams?

These critiques became particularly sharp last season, after McNabb signed a new contract worth $115 million over 12 years. When a player earns money like that, he can no longer be considered a "developing" star--he has to perform to the level of his paycheck.

Yet McNabb's success over the past few seasons isn't wishful thinking, and Philadelphia fans are not social engineers--if Donovan didn't give fans reason to be optimistic, they'd have made his life much more difficult. Philly fans have seen the results of McNabb's play. He led the Eagles to two consecutive NFC championship games. The team is 36-22 with McNabb at the helm. He finished second in voting for the MVP award in his first season as a starter. And whether they are signs of weakness or of strength, McNabb's Houdini-esque runs, in which he escapes the clutches of defensive backs and eats up huge chunks of yardage, bring fans to their feet.

Meanwhile, the Eagles' defense has received all the credit it richly deserves. Over the last few seasons it has been regarded as one of the best defensive squads in the league. And when the defense pulls out a victory, their teammates on offense are often the first to point it out. What has given Philadelphia fans hope is that finally the defense and the offense are both, at the same time, poised to reach the top ranks and carry the team over the hump and to Philadelphia's first Super Bowl since the 1980 season.

Rush Limbaugh's mistake may be that he didn't spend enough time studying how people in Philadelphia feel about McNabb. Otherwise he would have known that while fans and the media have placed their hopes in him, no one lets him off the hook. No one ever gets off the hook in Philadelphia.

BUT THE NFL does bear some responsibility for feeding Limbaugh's fears. Last year the league bowed to pressure from Johnnie Cochran and other civil rights celebrities who argued that the NFL doesn't have enough black head coaches. A commission studied the issue and instituted a new rule requiring teams to interview at least one black candidate for every coaching vacancy.

The Detroit Lions bucked the system during this past off-season. When Steve Mariucci was let go from the San Francisco 49ers, the Lions pounced. They interviewed and hired Mariucci (a Michigan native) almost immediately. No black candidates were interviewed for the job. No other white candidates were interviewed for the job, either. And because the Lions didn't go through the charade of bringing in a black candidate, the league fined team president Matt Millen $200,000.

Scores of commentators and analysts, both black and white, have pointed out the obvious side-effect of the NFL policy: All black coaching candidates now have a pall of "tokenism" cast over their interviews. Yet the league stands by its policy, leading more astute observers than Limbaugh to believe that the NFL wants to Miracle-Gro a successful black coach, rather than simply allowing successful black coaches (like Dennis Green, Tony Dungy, and Herman Edwards) to blossom on their own.

But for quarterbacks, the charge doesn't hold water. Few coaches are willing to sacrifice their team's success in order to make a social statement. Roughly a quarter of NFL teams have black starting quarterbacks today, and most are top-notch players. Steve McNair, Michael Vick, Daunte Culpepper--it didn't take a racial experiment to find out these guys are awesome.

Rush Limbaugh was incorrect when he claimed that Donovan McNabb's reputation is built on race-based social promotion. While such affirmative action may exist in the wider world that Limbaugh typically examines, it doesn't hold as much sway in the wide world of sports--at least not on the field. He injected race into an issue where it doesn't belong. Now that he's resigned, this controversy will die down. But Limbaugh still ought to reexamine the facts and admit that he screwed up, so as to avoid giving anyone else an excuse to claim he's a racist.

Ed Walsh is a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush and a native of the Philadelphia suburbs. He's still hoping the Eagles can go 14-2 this season.

Correction appended 10/3/03: The article originally identified Kweisi Mfume as president of the NCAA. He is, of course, president of the NAACP.

Inc



To: calgal who wrote (470957)10/4/2003 2:43:04 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 769670
 
The B-Team
We know how the contenders are spending the weekend, but what about recall's second stringers?
by Bill Whalen
10/03/2003 8:50:00 AM

HERE'S WHERE RECALL STANDS, heading into the final weekend:

* Arnold's on a bus and on the defensive over Gropergate ("I have sometimes behaved badly," he said yesterday. "I have been on rowdy movie sets and have done things I thought were playful but I have offended people. I am deeply sorry about that and I apologize.") We'll see if the 200 prying reporters in tow will let Arnold change the subject.

* Gray Davis is on the ropes, hoping to somehow reverse the perception that he's on his way out. Davis has spent so much time in voter-rich Southern California the past two weeks that some wags are calling his effort to save his job: "To Live and Die in L.A."

* As for Cruz Bustamante and Tom McClintock: They're on the outside looking in. Both are hoping for a last-minute surge should Davis and Schwarzenegger finish badly.

And what about the other 157 candidates who can get a vote next Tuesday? There are 135 names on the recall ballot, plus another 26 Californians who jumped in last week as write-in candidates, for a total of 161 choices. Some will do their best to get noticed in recall's waning hours. That includes two dozen obscure hopefuls who've chartered a bus and plan to birddog the Schwarzenegger caravan and try to meet the press whenever Team Arnold makes a pit stop. One of them is Jim Vandeventer. He's an openly gay Republican who once sold BMWs in Beverly Hills, plans to vote "no" on recall, and says he'll change his party affiliation after the election because he thinks the GOP lacks tolerance.

Time, space and your limited patience prevent us from offering a comprehensive rundown of the rest of the field. But here are a few candidates who didn't get their entire 15 minutes of recall fame:

Up in Smoke: Meet Ned Roscoe, a Libertarian party candidate whose family owns California's Cigarettes Cheaper! store chain. It's not Roscoe's first campaign--in 1998, his family tried to defeat Rob Reiner's Proposition 10, which imposed a 50-cent-per-pack tax on cigarettes to fund early childhood development programs. How did Roscoe wind up in the recall? His father figured that if every California smoker got behind one candidate, it could produce a winning plurality. "Since I was the big talker," the younger Roscoe says. "I got the job."

If elected, Roscoe wants a statewide grand jury to investigate government fraud. He says he'd eliminate 60,000 state jobs and ditch 10,000 "stupid" laws (to Roscoe, that's "minimum milk price regulations, cosmetic standards for plums, gasoline recipe laws, and others"). Souvenir collectors take note: Roscoe has a recall deck of cards (he's on all the aces and the king of hearts; Davis is the joker).

Search for Tomorrow: Garrett Gruener is a venture capitalist and co-founder of the Ask Jeeves Internet search engine. That means he has deep pockets (he's spent about $1 million of his own fortune on TVs ads and Web pop-ups) and, more than a passing interest in politics (he plans to keep his issues-heavy website (www.gg4g.com) running after the election).

Gruener's obsession is Proposition 13 and its allowances for commercial property. He also believes California should return to its spending levels of four years ago--in everything except for education--in order to reduce the coming deficit. As governor, he says he'd start a dialogue on the "structural gridlock" in Sacramento (over-protected incumbents), how term limits have failed the state, and why California is one of only a handful of states to require a two-thirds majority to enact a budget (next March's Budget Accountability proposal would end that, as well as the two-thirds requirement for tax increases).

Rich Men, "Poorman": Of the 26 write-in candidates, the only one approaching celebrity status is Jim "Poorman" Trenton, Rock Dees's radio sidekick. He's, like, totally gnarly, dude--a Republican (motto: "A Poor Man for a Poor State") who describes himself as a "total surfer," wants to legalize marijuana, prostitution, and gambling, and use the revenue from the aforementioned commodities to pay off the deficit.

Trenton is realistic about his chances ("If I can get 100 votes, it'll be like I won in a landslide"). But he knows how to work the system. California law allows candidates to provide an alternative name for voters (write-in hopefuls won't appear on the recall ballot, but polling places are required to provide their names to voters who request them). So if you can't remember "Trenton" on October 7, simply write-in "Poorman."

Hoop Dreams: It's bad enough that NBA broadcaster Bill Walton has access to a microphone and that one of his sons is now a Laker; imagine how insufferable he'd be if another of his sons had the governor's bully pulpit. Nathan Whitecloud Walton, one of the NBA legend's four boys and currently a Stanford MBA student, is on the recall ballot. The younger Walton, who calls the election "an exercise in political activism," is focusing on affordable education, environmental protection and traffic congestion.

Walton, a basketball standout at Princeton, doesn't think the Terminator is Ivy League material. "I'm still not sure Arnold knows how to read or write," Walton told the Daily Princetonian. "He's 56 years old. His entire life has been about weightlifting and movies about killing people. That hardly inspires me to place my trust in his hands. Running the state takes a lot of analytical skills."

OTHER CANDIDATES have had brief, shining moments. Republican businessman William Tsangares managed to get booted from "The Tonight Show" (he was there with about 90 other recall candidates) for slipping on a Terminator mask, screaming "equal time" and tossing money into the crowd. (Prompting Jay Leno to note, "Gee, it's hard to believe there's a nut in the audience.") Also, on the same show, Leno received not a single but a double one-finger salute from porn doyenne/recall hopeful Mary Carey after the comedian drew a parallel between her body of work and a punch-card ballot.

By the way, for those of you who think recall is not just an out-of-body but an out-of-state conspiracy, the ballot includes a Bob Dole and a Teddy Kennedy. Democrat Edward T. Kennedy, a turnaround business management consultant, says "the purpose of government is to both promote and protect the welfare of the people" (that alone separates him from the other guy from Massachusetts). Robert "Butch" Dole, an ex-Marine who runs a bay-area delivery service (personal motto: "No Excuses, No Sniveling"), says he'd take a 20 percent pay cut if elected and would freeze all government pay raises until the state budget is in the black.

That information comes straight from Dole's website--I'd hate for him to tell me to stop lying about his record.

Bill Whalen is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, where he follows California and national politics.