Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dealer who wrote (59377)	10/5/2003 4:37:10 PM
From: RR	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

Hi Dealer! Glad you made it safely back and had a productive trip. Sounds like it was really something, too. Wow, 2500. Hang in there on that learning curve, especially if those successful folks are saying it has a long learning curve. You know the saying ..... if it were really that easy, everyone would be doing it. (g) Yep, had a great weekend here. Lots of stuff going on with kids and things. Looked like a parking lot here almost all weekend. Folks in and out, eating everything. Wild. RR

To: Dealer who wrote (59377)	10/6/2003 10:27:07 AM
From: Red Scouser	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Infineon Technologies AG's (IFX) legal attempt to block Rambus Inc. (RMBS) from collecting patent royalties on a high-speed computer memory technology ended Monday when the U.S. Supreme Court turned away the company's appeal. The high court's rejection of the Infineon petition clears a major hurdle for Rambus to collect royalties from computer chip companies that use a high-speed memory standard from the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council, or JEDEC, a standard-setting body for the industry. Use of the standard chip memory technologies covered by Rambus patent claims has developed into a $15 billion industry. Wall Street analysts have been watching the outcome of the Supreme Court appeal closely. One analyst, Erach Desai of American Technology Research in Boston, said the company could collect as much as $45 million annually in royalties from Infineon alone. Some other companies, including Intel Corp. (INTC) and the South Korean conglomerate Samsung Corp. already pay royalties. But additional companies might soon have to pay royalties that could, with Infineon's share, add up to $420 million annually for Rambus, estimates a research report by B. Riley & Co. in Los Angeles. Micron Technology Inc. (MU) and Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., a unit of South Korea's Hynix Semiconductor Inc., are two that could end up paying royalties. Still pending against Rambus is a lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission. Other companies have also sued. At issue are allegations that Rambus, a Los Altos, Calif., chip engineering company, participated in JEDEC high-memory standard setting negotiations from 1991 to 1995, then turned around and tried to collect royalties on patents it held once the standard was set. Litigation in the matter began in 2000 when Rambus sued Infineon for royalty payments. Infineon, a German chip maker, cried fowl, saying Rambus was required to disclose the patent claims during the JEDEC proceedings. A 2001 trial in the Richmond, Va., U.S. District Court resulted in a jury verdict that favored Infineon, awarding about $10 million in damages and litigation costs to the company. The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which handles patent lawsuit appeals, reversed the trial court ruling in early 2003, however. Infineon hired former Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr for its appeal to the Supreme Court. In the appeal, Starr attacks the appeals court decision. "The Federal Circuit has struck again," Starr said, adding it had "violated the most basic norms of appellate procedure" when it overturned the jury verdict. "The decision below thus threatens to crown Rambus' fraudulent scheme with success," Starr concluded. Rambus, for its part, urged the Supreme Court to let the lower court decision stand. Rambus has recently won separate litigation brought against it. A lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission is still pending. The case is Infineon Technologies v. Rambus, 03-37. -By Mark H. Anderson, Dow Jones Newswires, 202 862-9230; mark.anderson@dowjones.com