Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (10881)	10/5/2003 4:44:09 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793624

The women involved have little credence IMO, if they didn't file a police report AT THE LEAST, when the alleged incidents occurred You really can't make an argument that way, IMO. Every incident involves one grab, as in passing. Annoying, but not criminal. If you were riding buses in Rome, that would happen on a frequent basis.

To: KLP who wrote (10881)	10/5/2003 4:53:02 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793624

The women involved have little credence IMO, if they didn't file a police report AT THE LEAST, when the alleged incidents occurred. Even if they didn't go public. No, the legal issues, and I have no idea whether these incidents rise to that level, but the legal issues involve contemporary activities. If they talked with friends, counselors, relatives, etc., that counts as evidence. It may not be convincing evidence but it is evidence. The second part of the issues is whether there is a pattern; more incidents. That's why the Starr people worked so hard to find other incidents. Looks like, if someone decides to do something prosecutorial here, they'll have lots of incidents.