To: Rambi who wrote (76512 ) 10/5/2003 8:55:05 PM From: one_less Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486 Ah..."It had nothing to do with Aunty K, or with Mojo, or the discussion, for that matter. I see. Well you qualified it in that context, so it was hard to tell what your highness's nose had gotten stuck in. If you mean to say something to or about me and intend to make some legitimate point doing it, I suggest you try posting to me and with less coded garbage. I don't think you did anything but send warm cocoa to someone in response to a request to do so. Now you are simply being a phoney. As a matter of fact karen was drawing personal inferences that were unqualified, untrue, and definitely not validated by the mojo scenario. She had gone on quite a fishing trip and hasn't docked her boat yet. I found HER comment about the character being sheltered SOOOOOO ironic given the level of risk aversion she has expressed regarding her own life and the interaction here on the thread. Given that the mojo character is totally a venture against the tide of conventional attitudes he could hardly be termed sheltered. Do you all really think you are anything less than cultural lock steps from the last three decades, I realise you are all getting old but sheesh... I find it interesting that a characteristic that is hardly news (karen is very reserved, doesn't involve herself in anything that would challenge her or her ways of thinking 'sheltered') yet personal and as much of her persona on line as anything becomes "spewed venum" when you are given the call to action, Rambi, x, solon etc ... or did you just happen along it ...chyaaaa g'ittarest. I did not see it as an attack at all but simply pointing out an irony in the discussion. Nor do I see flushing out thread behavior, pointing out reasoning flaws etc. as a personal attack. Given the actual personal attacks that have been levied toward and about me over the last few weeks, your involvement just looks biased, allied, and all wet ... and that is being kind.